And if you infect another human being with COVID, you'll have to live with that. I don't get how you can even risk doing something so heinous.
-
-
Replying to @LauraDekker1 @AndrewLazarus4 and
Given that risk is 0% I live with it quite well, thanks
5 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Just4TheCause @LauraDekker1 and
That risk is absolutely not 0%.
1 reply 1 retweet 16 likes -
Replying to @swedishchf @LauraDekker1 and
Really? Hmmm Science disagrees with you... 10 MILLION studied, 300 asymptomatics identified "Further swab testing of 1174 close contacts of these 300 asymptomatic positive cases were all negative" Asymptomatic people do NOT spread COVID https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/11/201130131511.htm …pic.twitter.com/aqtMYcswv6
5 replies 1 retweet 4 likes -
Replying to @Just4TheCause @swedishchf and
Not what that study says though “But these findings do not show...”pic.twitter.com/RG7U0IjNrR
2 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @ewanrross @swedishchf and
I love how you somehow think that's a "gotcha" It is a meaningless non-sequitur allowing publication An expression that, despite the data demonstrating it doesn't happen, aberrations could occur
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Just4TheCause @swedishchf and
Humpty Dumpty science then? The words mean exactly what you want them to mean. The paper explicitly says that the results don’t show what you are claiming it shows. It’s fair to assume that the paper is, in this respect, correct.
1 reply 0 retweets 13 likes -
Replying to @ewanrross @swedishchf and
Show me a single case where they tracked a COVID case, definitively, to an asymptomatic person (no other exposure, anywhere)
9 replies 1 retweet 2 likes -
-
Replying to @swedishchf @ewanrross and
Premise is shit Nobody tested the world population over-&-over-&-over for SARS-CoV-1; who knows if it is STILL circulating & continues to be asymptomatic? They have no data on asymptomatic-SPREAD of SARS-CoV-2, only supposition regarding viral load PCR is NOT QUANTITATIVE
8 replies 0 retweets 1 like
That might have been true 25 years ago, but it hasn’t been true for quite some time now. Haven’t you heard of quantitative real time PCR? Or quantitative real time reverse transcriptase PCR? Seriously, you have no clue what you’re talking about.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.