Yet another example of how being an atheist doesn't necessarily mean that you are reason- or science-based in your belief system.https://twitter.com/MrAtheistPants/status/1339008019829428225 …
-
-
for 95% no big deal. the other 5%, its death unless you get excellent medical care.
-
It's definitely not "nbd" for 95%. About 1/3 of symptomatic patients have long-term (i.e. weeks to months) of big problems with it.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
iTs mAtH aKsHuLLy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Well, he said he didn't fear it as much, not that it was not more serious. There's a nuance there.
-
300,000 dead in about 9 months. Death tolls for flu: 12,000–61,000 That’s some enormous nuance.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It’s only based on ‘math’ (assuming your numbers are correct) that mortality is the only metric, not morbidity. The 300,000 dead is with lockdowns in place and at least some mask use.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Unless you are >70, then you can reduce your risk of death, even if exposed to less than flu with 1 action --> get your vitamin D level above 30 ng/mL and keep it there. I challenge you to find ANY contrary data. I'm not saying engage in risky behavior or don't take other action
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
