My purpose in posting that blog post was to say that #Ivermectin promoters are pushing EXACTLY THE SAME KINDS of horrible population "studies" #Hydroxychloroquine promoters were pushing several months ago, this time for Ivermectin. Bad study design is bad study design.
#COVID19 https://twitter.com/EdoajoEric/status/1338908233382187008 …
-
-
For example..... Come on, you wrote a flawless blog on HCQ. It sums up everything I tried to articulate about why HCQ is bad. Take me through the ivermectin data, pretty please with a cherry on top
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
As i said im not a fundamentalist, i never want to be misled by bad data, if the data are bad please help me understand why
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
(spoiler alert: he's looking them up and reading for the first time now. I hope that if these analyses are trash, the analysis he's conducting for the first time right now will explain why)
-
Nope. I looked at the ones on that website that
#Ivermectin fans all cite. Bloody awful. I looked at some of the cited RCTs, too. Pretty crappy, and none peer-reviewed yet that I could find. Also, that site is run by the same people who pushed#Hydroxychloroquine. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I've been begging this dude for 100 tweets to please critique the JC epidemiological data. He told me be careful what I wish for with a wink emoji. I explained if I've been duped by bad analysis I want to know please tell me. After 100 more he gives me "crappy" and "bloody awful"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
I'm not arguing, "Population studies cited for