My purpose in posting that blog post was to say that #Ivermectin promoters are pushing EXACTLY THE SAME KINDS of horrible population "studies" #Hydroxychloroquine promoters were pushing several months ago, this time for Ivermectin. Bad study design is bad study design.
#COVID19 https://twitter.com/EdoajoEric/status/1338908233382187008 …
-
-
Ok, that's the 4th time I have asked you to comment specifically on the methodologies used, where you responded vaguely with no indication you read and analyzed these data. It's weird bc your blog on HCQ is fantastic. Why cant u bring urself past: these bad, so those bad?
-
Be very careful what you wish for...

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
If I have this wrong I would really like to know. I'm not an "anything" pusher, I want to help patients. But u gotta indicate that you have put more thought into this than: population studies for hcq were bad (they were!!) so all epidemiological evidence bad. I beg you.
-
Stop it with the straw man argument, already.
I'm not arguing, "Population studies cited for #Hydroxychloroquine were bad; so all epidemiological evidence is bad." I'm arguing, "The population studies being cited for#Ivermectin for#COVID19 are AS BAD as those for HCQ." - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.