Their families are begging too. The doctors explain the risks and that the benefit is only theoretical. Some patients want it anyway and some try it. Doctors notice a trend that the patients who take one of the drugs seem to be improving and surviving better than those that don’t
-
-
Replying to @Bertie_222 @ThugaManLaForge and
They track data and run statistics and the effect is significant. Then one of you shows up with a gun and locks the warehouses, saying we must wait until multi-year, double-blind, RCTs can be done! You saved everyone fro the "quacks"!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @JaiKanta22 and
If the exact situation you were describing happened the way you say it I would not show up with a gun. You don't need a multi year study. You could get one done in a few weeks right now. All I'm saying is what I've been saying. There are no new data that justify an NIH review.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @JaiKanta22 and
So easy, right. With all the scientists *in the world* working on this, and they overlooked that they could just do a couple week RCT. So on the island, you would make them wait another few weeks?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @JaiKanta22 and
No. I am not arguing against doctors prescribing ivermectin. I am arguing against making the NIH conduct a review to try to get a perfect rating. That's not gonna happen.
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @JaiKanta22 and
Apparently none of you trusts the NIH to come to the right conclusion.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @JaiKanta22 and
I don't trust you not to be wasting their time.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @Bertie_222 and
Just to be clear: the outcomes data from countries in which mass ivermectin distribution campaigns were done: the WHO CDC or NIH shouldnt look at it?
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @EdoajoEric @ThugaManLaForge and
Looking at those numbers will be as useful as looking at the same numbers for
#Hydroxychloroquine was: Not very, other than to mislead.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/hcqtrial-com-astroturf-and-disinformation-about-hydroxychloroquine-and-covid-19-on-steroids/ …1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
Silly man. The argument is that #Ivermectin promoters are doing EXACTLY THE SAME KINDS OF BAD POPULATION STUDIES that #Hydroxychloroquine promoters pushed several months ago. #COVID19
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
Silly man? Oh man that stings. Perhaps you should start by examining the methodology? Ivermectin promoters is also cute. I remember when we were "steroid promoters" before the RECOVERY Trial.
0 replies 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.