You really love to take things out of context. *You* said further studies are needed, but that's not the role of the NIH. I was just pointing out that it is a role of the NIH.
-
-
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
You said the NIH should review the data. Not fund more studies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
Please refer to other tweet. Yes, I am asking for NIH review. You said, we need studies, but that isn't NIH role. I corrected you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @ThugaManLaForge and
I do hope that based on review, they will fund studies, because getting funding is difficult for an off-patent drug. But you are correct, right, accurate, absolutely on target that I said the NIH should review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet) Retweeted Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet)
And the NIH shouldn't review it yet. There's no data worth reviewing. To clarify. The role of the NIH is not to review bad data and render opinions.https://twitter.com/ThugaManLaForge/status/1337841725260361731?s=19 …
Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet) added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
So instead of responding to thousands of front line doctors who are begging for action, they should listen to you before reviewing anything. Got it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
No. They should follow their protocols. I'm not as important as my children think I am.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
So don't their protocols say that when a senator sends them something for review they should consider evaluating it? You all are really splitting hairs here. I really don't understand if it takes 5 minutes what are you afraid of?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
In afraid of the NIH getting into the position of being made to review every red herring they get thrown their way.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @Bertie_222 and
If the doctors pushing
#Ivermectin think it's so great for#COVID19, they should submit grant applications to the appropriate Institute at@NIH, like everyone else, and let the study section review them and assign priority scores, just like everyone else.3 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Of course, NIH study sections expect a lot of compelling preliminary data, a well thought out plan, and a description of the methods used that demonstrates that the applicants know what they are talking about and can do what they propose to do. That might be an impediment.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
After all, as was the case for the
#Hydroxychloroquine cultists, I am not getting the vibe from the#Ivermectin believers that they can meet these criteria.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @Bertie_222 and
I was hoping for something different. But the argument of, maybe it works so we should just go full steam ahead and the doctors that are supporting it also pushing other therapies rates questionable to trash is the exact same flavor as the HCQ heads.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.