The NIH funding research is not an NIH review. You should eat potato salad.
-
-
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
You really love to take things out of context. *You* said further studies are needed, but that's not the role of the NIH. I was just pointing out that it is a role of the NIH.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
You said the NIH should review the data. Not fund more studies.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
Please refer to other tweet. Yes, I am asking for NIH review. You said, we need studies, but that isn't NIH role. I corrected you
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @ThugaManLaForge and
I do hope that based on review, they will fund studies, because getting funding is difficult for an off-patent drug. But you are correct, right, accurate, absolutely on target that I said the NIH should review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet) Retweeted Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet)
And the NIH shouldn't review it yet. There's no data worth reviewing. To clarify. The role of the NIH is not to review bad data and render opinions.https://twitter.com/ThugaManLaForge/status/1337841725260361731?s=19 …
Captain Save-A-Ho(rnet) added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
So instead of responding to thousands of front line doctors who are begging for action, they should listen to you before reviewing anything. Got it
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
No. They should follow their protocols. I'm not as important as my children think I am.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ThugaManLaForge @MauiMescudi and
So don't their protocols say that when a senator sends them something for review they should consider evaluating it? You all are really splitting hairs here. I really don't understand if it takes 5 minutes what are you afraid of?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Bertie_222 @MauiMescudi and
In afraid of the NIH getting into the position of being made to review every red herring they get thrown their way.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like
If the doctors pushing #Ivermectin think it's so great for #COVID19, they should submit grant applications to the appropriate Institute at @NIH, like everyone else, and let the study section review them and assign priority scores, just like everyone else.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
Of course, NIH study sections expect a lot of compelling preliminary data, a well thought out plan, and a description of the methods used that demonstrates that the applicants know what they are talking about and can do what they propose to do. That might be an impediment.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @gorskon @ThugaManLaForge and
After all, as was the case for the
#Hydroxychloroquine cultists, I am not getting the vibe from the#Ivermectin believers that they can meet these criteria.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.