Not again! @VPrasadMDMPH is at it again, doubling down on his "dunking on a 7' hoop" analogy. @medpagetoday, you really need to publish a rebuttal by a medical skeptic, as the eminent Dr. Prasad takes a germ of a reasonable point and turns it into
.https://www.medpagetoday.com/blogs/vinay-prasad/90109 …
-
Show this thread
-
If it's not needed to debunk homeopathy, then why is George Washington University still promoting it? If you can't add, it's not a good idea to be doing calculus. Similarly, if you can't debunk homeopathy, it might be harder to debunk more advanced quackery, like HCQ for COVID.pic.twitter.com/iP6wQJFJCx
1 reply 2 retweets 5 likes -
Not just that, but he's very US-centric. In some countries in Europe, the government does pay for homeopathy. France did for many years and is only now phasing it out...because of the activity of skeptics!
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @LymeScience and
Of course, the skeptics in France who spoke out about homeopathy faced sanctions from
@ordre_medecins. One doc even had his license suspended for signing a statement condemning homeopathy as quackery!https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020/02/21/president-of-fake-medecine-suspended-homeopath/ …1 reply 3 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @LymeScience and
And, of course, in France, homeopathy is big business, just like pharmaceutical companies, thanks to Boiron.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes
Then, of course, if you think refuting #COVID19 disinformation is important, then how can you be opposed to refuting homeopathy when homeopathy is being offered to treat COVID?https://respectfulinsolence.com/2020/11/04/homeopathy-for-covid-19/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.