Silly antivaxxer. The answer is simple. I'll get the #COVID19 vaccine as soon as it's made available to me at my hospital, but not before frontline healthcare workers who treat lots of #COVID19 patients (ER, ICU, etc.) get theirs. They are at higher risk than I am. https://twitter.com/DRMartinLLC/status/1336297200700317696 …
-
-
I won't discount that point as of course clinical validation is best, if you didn't notice we are in a pandemic. The risk harm ratio as displayed in the meta data disagrees with your comment here. If there are better treatments currently available please elaborate
-
You're making exactly the same argument
#Hydroxychloroquine cultists made in March and April, you know. How did that work out? Maybe#Ivermectin will work out better, but HCQ showed the danger of bypassing RCTs even in a pandemic. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Also, he's a gastroenterologist, not an infectious disease doc. Your appeal to authority is less compelling than you think. Just because he did good in one area does not mean he's right about
#Ivermectin, and certainly his promotion of it as a "cure" is at best premature. -
Of course it's premature, this is a pandemic! Love to have a 3 yr 10k wide randomized dbl blind but the risk reward numbers put ivmn in a place that WARRENTS it's use for treatment IMMIEDATELY. 0.1!? CMON doc
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
There are multiple RCTs from all over showing convincing even overwhelming efficacy. national governments in India and Egypt with over 300 million people endorse its use. And unlike HCQ there are no dangerous side effects. What exactly is the downside of using it? None!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
