Also a self-refuting article. Why should the author care about how skeptics spend their time when there is war and hunger? Of course skeptics have written about flaws in mammograms. So the article has the bonus of being wrong too. https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/status/1334972387163394048 …
-
-
Will he look at them if someone else does? Or are we just speaking to the audience?
-
I kind of suspect someone who limited responses isn’t interested in discussion or more information.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
