Also a self-refuting article. Why should the author care about how skeptics spend their time when there is war and hunger? Of course skeptics have written about flaws in mammograms. So the article has the bonus of being wrong too. https://twitter.com/VPrasadMDMPH/status/1334972387163394048 …
-
-
Or maybe Dan Loxton’s retort...https://www.skeptic.com/insight/bigfoot-versus-the-quest-for-world-peace/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Honestly if someone finds satisfaction in debunking Bigfoot, so what? Not everything people do needs to serve some higher purpose.
-
And furthermore, learning how to debunk homeopathy can be very useful in learning how to debunk and science in mainstream medicine. The skills are the same. If every med student had a course in this, they’d be better at spotting bad science elsewhere.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
