Ugh. This guy. He's still at it with his crazy bad hot take on that mask study.
https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/940254 …
-
-
Whether I agree with
@drjohnm or not (BTW I do), I am disappointed that an educated person would refer to a colleague's opinion as "crazy." It is beneath us to turn a healthy debate into an adversarial discussion. Different paths but same destination>>public health.4 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I believe the crazy label refers to John's bogus take that no one actually believes masks are harmful. He's literally in denial about science denial, which is a very ivory tower perspective and one that is utterly useless when trying to debunk misinformation.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Come on Dan. Please. Did you read my essay? I addressed my unforced error on Twitter. And if you think I am in an ivory tower, well, I am tempted to write something ungracious.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like
Your take on masks and science denialist disinformation sure came across as ivory tower, because that's where I hear most of that sort of dismissal coming from.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.