“Pseudoskepticism” and “pseudoskeptics” are terms often misused by those who want to defend woo to describe skepticism and skeptics.
https://twitter.com/MitchHorowitz/status/1321094702985285632 …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @gorskon
Key word “often.” I think you do a lot of great work. But in this area you’re in the wrong company.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MitchHorowitz
What?
@stevennovella,@HHSkepDoc,@joeschwarcz, etc., are the “wrong company”? I beg to differ.1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @stevennovella and
It’s your call. If you go back into my article you’ll find that the practices I critique are ones you would probably agree are problematic.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MitchHorowitz @stevennovella and
And if you look at my Tweets you’ll find that my objections to the article mainly involve your horrible framing of
@GSoW_team as jihadists and your citing Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin as actual experts.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @MitchHorowitz and
Dr Gorski, please explain why you deem Rupert Sheldrake (a fellow of Clare College, Cambridge, who has previously worked in biochemistry and cell biology with funding from the Royal Society Rosenheim Research Fellowship) to not be a 'legitimate" researcher or "actual expert"?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I'll let @CoyneoftheRealm start, as won't have time to be on Twitter again for at least a couple of hours.https://newrepublic.com/article/115533/rupert-sheldrake-fools-bbc-deepak-chopra …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @MitchHorowitz and
This article does not answer the question/point I raised with you...
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.