All you need to know about how bad a take this article is is that the author cites Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin as "researchers" who, according to him, were treated unfairly by Randi, while he characterizes @GSoW_team as waging a "freewheeling digital jihad on Wikipedia."
https://twitter.com/MitchHorowitz/status/1320836372257714176 …
-
-
Hmmm...interesting. So you think people’s education and scientific background count for nothing if they ever “dare” to investigate or hypothesise on topics you find questionable?...Thank goodness we’ve moved on since the days of Galileo and other “heretics” been put to death!
-
No, they count for little or nothing if that person consistently does pseudoscientific "research" and advocates for positions not supported by science, though.

- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.