All you need to know about how bad a take this article is is that the author cites Rupert Sheldrake and Dean Radin as "researchers" who, according to him, were treated unfairly by Randi, while he characterizes @GSoW_team as waging a "freewheeling digital jihad on Wikipedia."
https://twitter.com/MitchHorowitz/status/1320836372257714176 …
-
-
The religious especially.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Rupert Sheldrake is a fellow of Clare College,Cambridge, who has previously worked in biochemistry and cell biology with funding from the Royal Society Rosenheim Research Fellowship. He didn't get to be a Cambridge fellow and receive such funding by being a pseudo "researcher"
-
Actually, yes he did. It’s surprisingly easy. Just look at all the professors and fellows in “integrative medicine” programs all over the US and Europe.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Or portray their warped thinking as “skepticism.” Disagreeing is good, disagreeing on reality is catastrophic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.