Yes I've noticed the docs I deliberately followed who were touting HCQ don't mention it at all anymore. For the most part they are on about herd immunity now.
-
-
-
Yep. They've all moved on to different bad science and pseudoscience. The grift, however, continues.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Would you mind being more specific? Because there's a lot of disinfo peddling laymen that need to confront their wrongness.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Have been not are today - answer the question please.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Which ones? The Recovery Trial showed HCQ better than placebo. Was stopped early. Boulware showed HCQ arm doing better. Not enough patients to get to stat signif. Skipper stopped the trial before the HCQ arm, again doing better, reached stat signif. Tang overdosed patients.
-
The Chinese authorities even NOTED that Tang's doses overdosed patients, but those who tolerated the dose...did better than the control arm. Huh. Cavalcanti hid the fact that nearly half the control arm was medicated. You embarrass yourself and all of medical research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I learned in medical school that a RCT can fail to prove efficacy of an intervention vs placebo but cannot disprove it. Has something changed since ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The only rct that failed was the overdosis recovery , your out of date mister
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We throw the kitchen sink at them, but not HCQ.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.