"Surprisingly, the alleged falsehoods are not mentioned, making scientific discourse difficult", but here is my letter in @StanfordDaily defending @SWAtlasHoover, criticized by 98 Stanford faculty members, and his age-targeted #COVID19 strategy.https://www.stanforddaily.com/2020/09/16/letter-to-the-editor-scott-atlas-and-lockdowns/ …
-
-
When it’s just some doctor on Twitter or writing a blog, maybe it’s not that big a deal, but when a doctor like
@SWAtlasHoover gains the ear of powerful, disaster often results. -
But about your bringing your contempt for NPs into it again in the form of a specious comparison. You know the difference between Dr. Atlas and NPs? NPs don’t hold forth outside their scope of practice, which is exactly what Dr. Atlas is doing with respect to
#COVID19. - Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Perhaps the Dunning-Kruger effect applies to you as well? No.. hmm how about definitely the Conflict of Interest effect? Having a wife as NP perhaps coloring your judgment here so much so that you call another physician, who you don’t know and have never met “vile” ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.