When Donald Trump has practically staked his reelection on an EUA for a #COVID19 vaccine before the election, it's not at all unreasonable to preemptively push back against that bet.https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trump-vaccine-election/2020/09/05/c0da86d6-edf5-11ea-99a1-71343d03bc29_story.html …
-
-
Show this thread
-
And it's not as though
@US_FDA hasn't already shown itself to be susceptible to pressure from the Trump administration through its previous ill-advised approval of EUAs for#Hydroxychloroquine and#convalescentplasma.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If the German/French/Canadian equivalents of the FDA approve the vaccine, I'm in. It's sad AF that the US FDA can't be trusted.
-
Yep, but we know they won’t before our election.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No. We can't trust anything coming out of the Trump White House.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I agree. When it is convenient they'll question efficacy, but are still careful not to mention the word "safety." Repeal the indemnity clause. Demand safety above all, and you'll find a lot more vax adherents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This conversation sounds strangely familiar to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
