NYTimes is already reporting he is right.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/23/world/covid-19-coronavirus.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage#link-54e009ad …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Given what we have seen a ploy such as this is not beyond them even though it would be completely irresponsible and despicable. That actually makes it seem more likely really.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We test therapies based on science - and don’t approve based on notions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Don't see how this travesty doesn't up with *less* plasma being donated. It has the Trump stain now, so science-driven patients will think they're aiding his agenda by donating. Can't imagine Trump supporters flocking to make up the difference.
-
(Conforming w/Dr. Hotez's idea that it's laying groundwork for EUAs in general, not plasma.)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
From the peanut gallery... EUA's are unmanaged and provide no data that can be used to even generate a SWAG. We need a documentation process for off label and EUA's. Someone said 300 patients recovered fine. Someone needs to check their health, check their antibody titer... etc.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.