The comparison of an unknown to a true, verifiable, and accurate standard will yield a validated measurement, in epistemology! Any disagreement?
-
-
There is no true, verifiable or accurate standard here. There are no “measurements”. There is no standard of measurement presented to offer comparison. There are arrows and lines, and an assertion that they mean something. That’s all. But plenty for you evidently.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
@Bevvie112 only uses the gold standard of human gross anatomy to make gender determinations! You cannot deny this fact!1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
You show me the claim. Show me the fact.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
@Bevvie112 has all of the anatomical markers to scientifically prove each and every claim!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Bring them here! Show us!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Please click on
@Bevvie112!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I would, but evidently she is not up to the scrutiny.pic.twitter.com/tYuoN5hHzh
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Please click on https://Twitter.com/@Bevvie112 !
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Again... blocked. Doesn’t look like your buddy wants this sort of attention. Not up to the challenge, I suppose.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
She blocked me too, even though I hadn’t engaged with this thread. Hilarious.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.