No, that “study” shows nothing of the sort. First, it’s not really a proper study. It’s a website. Second, it’s from an anonymous source. We have no idea who’s behind the website. This, it’s one of the worst designed pieces of crap science I’ve seen in a long time. https://twitter.com/drsimonegold/status/1292514131698839554 …
Correct. Once the randomized controlled clinical trial results start being reported, you can basically ignore all the previous retrospective observational studies. They don't matter any more. And there have now been several RCTs on #Hydroxychloroquine, all negative.
-
-
Retrospective and meta analysis studies can be valuable in identifying areas of further investigation such as possible safety signals but not for Rx decisions. CV HRT data is great example of where it seemed beneficial through meta analysis but was the exact opposite in practice
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
what if the controlled study gives toxic/near lethal doses? (Recovery). Collects all data in online survey (minn)?Is completely fraudulent (lancet)? Treats late stage very ill patients? What if the controlled studies are worthless? Because they are. (Peer-review is nothing-Fauci)
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.