No, that “study” shows nothing of the sort. First, it’s not really a proper study. It’s a website. Second, it’s from an anonymous source. We have no idea who’s behind the website. This, it’s one of the worst designed pieces of crap science I’ve seen in a long time. https://twitter.com/drsimonegold/status/1292514131698839554 …
-
-
Yes, but she doesnt like anybody tells her. Well from my side I told her she was a charlatan so out :-)) But I confirm she is a charlatan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Does anyone know why Trump-world is still pushing this treatment? Does Trump own stock in the manufacturer? This level of quackery supported by the government is insanity.
-
I think once a group (any group) gets attached to something like this it takes on a life of its own. It is also seems to be a core component of larger conspiracy theories/deep state stuff etc. I think a tribal mentality necessitates this kind of in-group signaling. Just my 2c
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
All of the positive studies here are chart reviews or retrospective studies. These studies are not considered valid for drug approval in any area because they are susceptible to selection bias. Every randomized, placebo controlled trial has shown no effect.
- Show replies
-
-
-
How do people like this ever get past journal club and grand rounds?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think she blocked you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
More like she is depending on the public having "no clue how to distinguish a good study from a bad one."
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.