Wtf ! « Not good data » ? His own 4000 patients !!! Not data
-
-
-
4000 patients choisis, avec des exclusions, non représentatifs de la population française atteinte de la covid et pour la grande majorité peu voire non symptomatique. Pas des excellentes données en effet pour un institut se voulant à la pointe de la recherche.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Bad data, bad methodology, bad understanding of clinical studies, amazing results
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not even with a good methodology
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's quite a statement. So did he hoodwink his peers into giving him all those awards?https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Didier_Raoult#Honours_and_awards …
-
2002: European Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases Excellence Award (France) 2003: Jean Valade Prize (Fondation pour la recherche médicale, France) 2005: Medical grand round (Chicago, USA) 2008: Sackler International Prize (Tel Aviv University)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
But analyzing good data doesn’t let him cosplay as the maverick scientist bucking the system. It doesn’t fit into the narrative of his fantasy
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
