Peer review is dependent on your peers
-
-
-
Maybe it was reviewed by dr immanuelle
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I’ve had scientists use this one in response directly to me: essentially “peer reviewed” = “above reproach.” I’d say back, “You need better friends.”
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It should increase the prior for the validity of the paper, shouldn't it? If not, science should do away with this procedure.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Peer review today is such an abject mess. I just saw yet another 'peer reviewed' published study where the abstract didn't match the rest of the paper. Abstract: We conclude N. Paper: We can't conclude N, and here's why. What's the paper being touted as?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am coming to the conclusion that student reviewed law review articles are the most reliable. Why? Because a bunch of unfortunate 2Ls check every single footnote to make sure the source supports the claim being made. And every claim requires a footnote.
#lawreviews#peerreviewThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Keep in mind that the members of these committees often have no training at all in the issues they are responsible to oversee. Few are literate in basic evaluation methodologies, few have basic scientific or math literacy, few have ever managed projects, programs, businesses.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
People can farm anything with peer review. It's scary.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.