Apparently a few skeptics who (or so they claim) previously admired my work are oh-so-"disappointed" in me because I responded to @jk_rowling's transphobic junk science in a snarky, disrespectful manner and because I don't support their nonsense about Trans people.
-
-
One good thing. The transphobes are coming out of the woodwork, allowing me to mute or block them.
Show this thread -
It also identifies them for others to block. Think of it as my little public service.
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Narrow minds are riled lately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I riled up a few. Some people do to personal biases can’t follow the evidence that gender is not binary
-
Take a look on my page,gender most def is binary. I know u like to lump in gender identity or someones personal feelings in, but gender = biological & genetical verifiable sex. Nothing else. If gender isnt sex why would one trans? what does bi-sexual mean? Or same sex relations??
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Gotta love people that barely passed high school and/or college biology trying to say what science is. These people don't understand what sexual karyotypes are or what biological sex is. They refuse to acknowledge the complexity of biological systems in favor of their bigotry.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.