Given that the estimated infection fatality rate for #COVID19 is probably less than 1%, how on earth does he know he wouldn’t have gotten the same results without his “protocol”? Answer: He doesn’t. He’s a hack and a quack. https://twitter.com/zev_dr/status/1280510013291757570 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Noting the fatality rate is based on ~30% asymptomatic (which he never sees). He actually seeing the other part of curve. And he’s getting good results.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
You’re a bit behind my friend. You must be thinking of the trial which was retracted -LOL. The first real RCT shows this, which the Dr is ignoring. surprised? not https://sharylattkisson.com/2020/07/breaking-hydroxychloroquine-lowers-covid-19-death-rate-study-finds/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Also, Sheryl Attkisson is an antivaccine conspiracy theorist.https://respectfulinsolence.com/2019/01/09/sharyl-attkisson-is-back/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Yeah. Not really. But slam a reporter for an article reporting on a study - instead of critiquing the actual published study. Sounds like your MO
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I did critique the actual study as much as I could do in a Tweet. So did one other person in this thread. But, go ahead and ignore that.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.