You are spreading misinformation. Please look up the 1986 vaccine protection act and stop embarrassing yourself. Merck is a big company that can be sued for other things but not vaccines as I correctly wrote in my post.
-
-
Replying to @hbhbglenn1 @gorskon and
You are spreading misinformation. If what you're saying is correct then how is this CURRENT liability lawsuit happening? Why does one of the expert lawyers in vaccine court state you can sue after vaccine court if you wish? Why does the government website state you can?pic.twitter.com/hE0QtahvHR
2 replies 0 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @hbhbglenn1 and
No dodging please. State why a GWU law professor and lawyer in vaccine court would lie. Then state why the government website for vaccine court would lie. Then state how a current vaccine liability lawsuit is actually happening if it's not possible. Be specific and direct.
2 replies 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @gorskon and
If what you are saying is correct that is great news but why don’t the parents of all the autistic children not know this? Where is this liability lawsuit? I’m very interested in learning more about this. Thanks
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @hbhbglenn1 @gorskon and
That makes no sense. Vaccines don't cause autism. I accept your apology.
1 reply 0 retweets 11 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @gorskon and
The CDC has twice done research that found links between vaccines and autism. Vaerstraten 1999 or 2000 and DiStefano 20??, the one where DrWilliam Thompson whistleblower that he was ordered to destroy data and did.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @hbhbglenn1 @gorskon and
Incorrect. Those are debunked conspiracy theories. Are you new here? The data was never destroyed. It remained on the CDC server for anyone to view. It was released to the public by a pro-vaccine autism advocate & it proved no fraud or cover up.
2 replies 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @gorskon and
http://whale.to/a/simpsonwood_meeting.html … Click on the transcript link at the top. This is the meeting where they discussed Vaerstraten’s research and the coverup of it. The two articles sum it up and are linked also.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @hbhbglenn1 @gorskon and
That’s a conspiracy theory website that traffics in anti-Semitic holocaust denial propaganda. Even so that is all based on an ingredient removed from vaccines decades ago. Have autism rates gone down since then?
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @thereal_truther @hbhbglenn1 and
It's also a 20-year-old conspiracy theory that we old timers demolished when
@RobertKennedyJr first published it almost exactly 15 years ago today. Let's just put it this way. The transcript doesn't show any conspiracy or coverup or data manipulation.https://skeptico.blogs.com/skeptico/2005/06/robert_f_kenned.html …1 reply 2 retweets 6 likes
I read the whole thing back in the day, and let's just say that I was underwhelmed by it as evidence of any sort of malfeasance. What I saw were scientists soberly addressing a concern and examining the evidence. https://oracknows.blogspot.com/2005/06/skeptico-reads-simpsonwood-transcript.html …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @thereal_truther and
I also examined
@RobertKennedyJr's conspiracyfest of an article that popularized the Simpsonwood conspiracy theory. It was full of cherry-picking, unsupported assertions, and, yes, conspiracy mongering. http://oracknows.blogspot.com/2005/06/saloncom-flushes-its-credibility-down.html …1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @thereal_truther and
Seriously, though. Antivaxxers who dredge up RFK Jr.'s 15-year-old conspiracy theory as a "gotcha" amuse me. They seem to think that science communicators have never heard of it or hadn't demolished it when it first hit the press 15 years ago this month.
1 reply 0 retweets 8 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.