There are only two conclusions one can make from @drscottjensen's scientifically ignorant BS. Either he doesn't know, in which case he is a disgrace to his profession, or he does know and is lying, in which case he is also a disgrace to his profession.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
No one said it isn't airborne. What we said is that it isn't free-floating virus particles in the air, it's virus in respiratory droplets, which are MUCH larger than individual virus particles.


- Show replies
-
-
-
I've been shocked how many of my peers are out there perpetuating these nonsense arguments bolstered by the platform their credentials provide them
-
As have I. I recently got into a "discussion" with a colleague claiming the virus must be getting less deadly because we now have so few patients being admitted to the ICU with it. Never mind that Michigan is one of only two states on track to contain the virus, at least for now.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Either way, the size of the droplets is MUCH bigger, big enough to be filtered.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Hey doc, keep it simple. Virus small. Carrier droplet, big Mask blocks carrier.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s also wrong in another way. 0.3 microns is the MOST penetrating particle. Filtering efficiency increases as the particle size is bigger AND smaller than 0.3 microns. So it easier to capture 0.1 because those particles oscillate.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.