-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Especially impressed by the logic in “masks are so effective they stop oxygen from getting through but so ineffective that they let much larger viruses just wander on in.”
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Oh, sweetie...
End of conversation
-
-
-
Plus if you take 5 to be true, it requires 1-3 to be false, since the virus is orders of magnitude larger than oxygen and carbon dioxide.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Let alone that masks don't even work like a giant sieves, they're much more complex at that scale, but this graphic isn't even internally consistent. Virus is too small to block with large pore size, but oxygen, 1,000X smaller, is stopped by the mask?
-
Yes, that is one of the main inconsistencies in the claims of anti-mask conspiracy theorists.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Point 1 says this: "Breathing through a mask decreases the amount of oxygen we need to live and be healthy" Does that mean a mask makes our lungs more efficient?
#PedanticPeteThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks to clumsy writing, the first one says wearing a mask causes us to need less oxygen.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.