Not endorsing this perspective (and note newspaper), but think we'll see more of this kind of critique. Need to be transparent about evid behind policies. Good communication key. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/15/two-metre-rule-has-no-basis-say-oxford-university-experts/?WT.mc_id=e_DM1256781&WT.tsrc=email&etype=Edi_FAM_New_ES&utmsource=email&utm_medium=Edi_FAM_New_ES20200616&utm_campaign=DM1256781 … "Much of the evidence informing policy in this outbreak is poor quality..."
-
-
Replying to @CaulfieldTim
Actually, there is evidence. It’s actually pretty good. Although 2 m isn’t hugely better than one meter, it is better.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/do-face-masks-decrease-the-risk-of-covid-19-transmission/ …
5 replies 3 retweets 15 likes
Replying to @gorskon @CaulfieldTim
It’s obvious that economics is driving this pushback. One can argue about specific guidelines, but if you relax social distancing AND stop requiring people to wear masks, we could be looking at disaster.
0 replies
1 retweet
4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.