Skip to content
  • Home Home Home, current page.
  • Moments Moments Moments, current page.

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Language: English
    • Bahasa Indonesia
    • Bahasa Melayu
    • Català
    • Čeština
    • Dansk
    • Deutsch
    • English UK
    • Español
    • Filipino
    • Français
    • Hrvatski
    • Italiano
    • Magyar
    • Nederlands
    • Norsk
    • Polski
    • Português
    • Română
    • Slovenčina
    • Suomi
    • Svenska
    • Tiếng Việt
    • Türkçe
    • Ελληνικά
    • Български език
    • Русский
    • Српски
    • Українська мова
    • עִבְרִית
    • العربية
    • فارسی
    • मराठी
    • हिन्दी
    • বাংলা
    • ગુજરાતી
    • தமிழ்
    • ಕನ್ನಡ
    • ภาษาไทย
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 简体中文
    • 繁體中文
  • Have an account? Log in
    Have an account?
    · Forgot password?

    New to Twitter?
    Sign up
gorskon's profile
David Gorski, MD, PhD
David Gorski, MD, PhD
David Gorski, MD, PhD
Verified account
@gorskon

Tweets

David Gorski, MD, PhDVerified account

@gorskon

Surgeon/scientist promoting science in medicine and exposing quackery. Editor of Science-Based Medicine. My opinions do NOT represent those of my employers.

Michigan, USA
sciencebasedmedicine.org
Joined October 2009

Tweets

  • © 2021 Twitter
  • About
  • Help Center
  • Terms
  • Privacy policy
  • Cookies
  • Ads info
Dismiss
Previous
Next

Go to a person's profile

Saved searches

  • Remove
  • In this conversation
    Verified accountProtected Tweets @
Suggested users
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @
  • Verified accountProtected Tweets @

Promote this Tweet

Block

  • Tweet with a location

    You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more

    Your lists

    Create a new list


    Under 100 characters, optional

    Privacy

    Copy link to Tweet

    Embed this Tweet

    Embed this Video

    Add this Tweet to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Add this video to your website by copying the code below. Learn more

    Hmm, there was a problem reaching the server.

    By embedding Twitter content in your website or app, you are agreeing to the Twitter Developer Agreement and Developer Policy.

    Preview

    Why you're seeing this ad

    Log in to Twitter

    · Forgot password?
    Don't have an account? Sign up »

    Sign up for Twitter

    Not on Twitter? Sign up, tune into the things you care about, and get updates as they happen.

    Sign up
    Have an account? Log in »

    Two-way (sending and receiving) short codes:

    Country Code For customers of
    United States 40404 (any)
    Canada 21212 (any)
    United Kingdom 86444 Vodafone, Orange, 3, O2
    Brazil 40404 Nextel, TIM
    Haiti 40404 Digicel, Voila
    Ireland 51210 Vodafone, O2
    India 53000 Bharti Airtel, Videocon, Reliance
    Indonesia 89887 AXIS, 3, Telkomsel, Indosat, XL Axiata
    Italy 4880804 Wind
    3424486444 Vodafone
    » See SMS short codes for other countries

    Confirmation

     

    Welcome home!

    This timeline is where you’ll spend most of your time, getting instant updates about what matters to you.

    Tweets not working for you?

    Hover over the profile pic and click the Following button to unfollow any account.

    Say a lot with a little

    When you see a Tweet you love, tap the heart — it lets the person who wrote it know you shared the love.

    Spread the word

    The fastest way to share someone else’s Tweet with your followers is with a Retweet. Tap the icon to send it instantly.

    Join the conversation

    Add your thoughts about any Tweet with a Reply. Find a topic you’re passionate about, and jump right in.

    Learn the latest

    Get instant insight into what people are talking about now.

    Get more of what you love

    Follow more accounts to get instant updates about topics you care about.

    Find what's happening

    See the latest conversations about any topic instantly.

    Never miss a Moment

    Catch up instantly on the best stories happening as they unfold.

    1. Timothy Caulfield‏Verified account @CaulfieldTim 16 Jun 2020

      Not endorsing this perspective (and note newspaper), but think we'll see more of this kind of critique. Need to be transparent about evid behind policies. Good communication key. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2020/06/15/two-metre-rule-has-no-basis-say-oxford-university-experts/?WT.mc_id=e_DM1256781&WT.tsrc=email&etype=Edi_FAM_New_ES&utmsource=email&utm_medium=Edi_FAM_New_ES20200616&utm_campaign=DM1256781 … "Much of the evidence informing policy in this outbreak is poor quality..."

      5 replies 2 retweets 10 likes
      David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon 16 Jun 2020
      Replying to @CaulfieldTim

      Actually, there is evidence. It’s actually pretty good. Although 2 m isn’t hugely better than one meter, it is better.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/do-face-masks-decrease-the-risk-of-covid-19-transmission/ …

      9:32 AM - 16 Jun 2020
      • 3 Retweets
      • 15 Likes
      • freetofu 🛍 👁🚁🚾 🐟 Brenda James T. Todd PenTool ARVIND SINGH ⚕ Marius Loots Brendan Hilbert, PhD Deon Christoph Metzner
      5 replies 3 retweets 15 likes
        1. David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @gorskon @CaulfieldTim

          It’s obvious that economics is driving this pushback. One can argue about specific guidelines, but if you relax social distancing AND stop requiring people to wear masks, we could be looking at disaster.

          0 replies 1 retweet 4 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. JC‏ @JaswithnoE 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @gorskon @CaulfieldTim

          Thought I read recently that 10’ was what was needed to be effective.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. New conversation
        2. Philip Koop‏ @philkoop 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @gorskon @CaulfieldTim

          The Q is ill-posed, as the recommendation combines 3 considerations, only 1 of which can be evidence-backed in this sense. 1) What is the likelihood of transmission as a function of distance? 2) What is an acceptable likelihood? 3) What is an acceptable / feasible distance?

          1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
        3. David Gorski, MD, PhD‏Verified account @gorskon 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @philkoop @CaulfieldTim

          It’s true. #2 and #3 are value judgments.

          0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
        4. End of conversation
        1. Timothy Caulfield‏Verified account @CaulfieldTim 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @gorskon

          Excellent piece, David. Spot on.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo
        1. Przemo-c‏ @przemo_c 16 Jun 2020
          Replying to @gorskon @CaulfieldTim

          I wonder what is the likelihood of crossing 1m distance with 2m recommendation and 1m. Would there be some effect that makes some people that take that recommendation lightly to be more likely to not cross that 1m barrier as this would be a big difference from recommendation.

          0 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
          Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. Undo
          Undo

      Loading seems to be taking a while.

      Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.

        Promoted Tweet

        false

        • © 2021 Twitter
        • About
        • Help Center
        • Terms
        • Privacy policy
        • Cookies
        • Ads info