He's correct. I'm beginning to wonder, however, if maybe that should change.https://twitter.com/venkmurthy/status/1268661836393656334 …
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
How should that be possible? Apart from a simple plausibility tests? You won't find manipulation in good doctored data without efforts way beyond a review.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's not all-or-nothing. Convincing fake data can take a lot more work to produce. Complete citations for collected data, including specific contacts, also makes fake data more risky.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Replying to @NIH_LLAMAS @ozaed
But most fraudulent papers aren't all-or-nothing, either. Most involve fudging data or only faking part of the data.
6:00 AM - 5 Jun 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
3 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.