Concernant l'utilisation de l'hydroxychloroquine en prophylaxie, qui est le plus crédible : le New England Journal of Medicine ou l'Indian Journal of Medical Research? Indice : seule l'équipe indienne a réalisé les diagnostics par PCR. C'est plus sérieux. http://www.ijmr.org.in/preprintarticle.asp?id=285520 …
-
-
The credibility means nothing when big money is involved. The medical research is a dirty world.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But PCR... it's serious!
-
Then ?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Way more serious than a preprint yes.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah Mr PhD is here. I recall you were one of the first people to applaud the Lancet study and call Didier Raoult a clown. Where is your apology for misleading your followers ? Nothing ? Not even a word ? What a shame
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
And what might be wrong with the Indian Journal of Medicine? I don't think it's credibility is anything short of the NEJM. Definitely not short enough to induce eye rolling anyway!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Flaws have already been spotted, the statistics are off, the conclusion is wrong. The data published leads to a positive outcome of Hq.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be careful with your positions
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's forgotten to take his medicine for Didier Raoult Derangement Syndrome. Also he can't tell a good study from a bad one.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is it, really?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
