Only if it’s bad science and that researcher’s “scratching a conservative itch” leads him to self-promoting media appearances that help right wing science denial machine pundits deny science.
Get out my tiny violin. https://twitter.com/anish_koka/status/1261641714252615680 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @gorskon
Ok, oh arbiter of what science is
. David, you do outstanding work debunking jade eggs, but seriously, put the politics aside, this seroprevalence study in Santa Clara with the usual limitations is in the jade egg category?4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Replying to @anish_koka
False dichotomy. There aren’t two categories of science, good and “jade egg.” A scientific study can be poor quality without being “jade egg.” It’s a continuum.
7:52 AM - 17 May 2020
0 replies
0 retweets
17 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.