Docs make good points https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu.be&v=xfLVxx_lBLU …
-
-
Infuriating peddlers. Infuriating.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, Docs do. The criticisms are weak and often contradictory. One example: your article cites the confirmed tests as the limited pool of people for mortality rate determination, then contradicts itself and says probably lots of people w/ disease not tested when inflating deaths.
-
Suppose they are right and only 1 in 5000 COVID-19 cases are fatal. With 60000 fatalities from the disease in the United States already, that means there must have been 300,000,000 cases in the country so far. Still want to die on this particular hill?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Quacks R Us
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To be fair...no more pseudoscience than the WHO stating the CFR for COVID19 was 3.4%. I mean, they were only off by 2 orders of magnitude. No biggie.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think we can all agree Gorski sucks.
-
Nope. Can't agree on that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
These doctors are doing covid testing in California, I trust their opinion.
-
Looks like you shouldn't have.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
