The paper you cite. How many do you think have read it of those who are pushing the "Gates is microchipping people" narrative? I will never give RFK Jr and other grifters a break. But I feel for those who are taken in by their narratives. That included my dad. He died b/c of it.
-
-
Tara - many have read it. So if you want to position yourself as an expert on vaccine issues then you need to be much more nuanced w/ your comments. You need to be more clear w/ your sources, and you need to sometimes acknowledge when the concern of the public cld be legitimate..
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
YOu don't know Tara very well, do you? She is nuanced, more so than most of us battling antivaccine disinformation.
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likes -
Gorski spare me your eyeroll. Remember when your science-based cult trashed this 2009 paper published by my research team?…basically over the idea that pathogens in the human microbiome could contribute to chronic inflammatory disease?


:https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-microbial-metagenome/ …3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @gorskon and
The same paper that led the Faculty of 1000 + Steven Witkin (Weill Cornell Medical College) to state “The observations presented in this review are thought-provoking and offer new ways of thinking about the origin of diseases and possible novel treatments.”pic.twitter.com/iKTJcpNn6v
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @gorskon and
I was 26 years old at the time, and it was one of my first-author papers. You tried to destroy my career by writing that blog post. It was so pathetic. I feel very sorry for the naive MD and PhD students who look up to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Oh please. I didn’t write that post.
@MarkCrislip did. That being said, Mark is an infectious disease doctor and knows what he’s talking about, which is why I’m sorry he retired from writing for@ScienceBasedMed.1 reply 0 retweets 14 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @aetiology and
Please? So you think that Crislip who wrote for YOUR site (a man in a position of authority) defaming a 26-year old female PhD student on the internet, without even ever speaking to her personally abt his “concerns” was OK?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @aetiology and
I note that you haven’t addressed his specific criticisms.
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @aetiology and
You're now saying that I should have taken the time to address the (unfounded) criticisms of a random man that harassed me online?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
The criticisms were not “unfounded,” in my view, and criticism of a paper is not “harassment.”
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @aetiology and
David the only acceptable response to what I just posted was a sincere apology. In the absence of that I’ll get back to work and leave this thread yet again. Goodbye.
6 replies 0 retweets 0 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.