I give the general public plenty of breaks. I understand most won't ever see the original research. It's the leaders like RFK Jr and others who push the "they're going to forcibly microchip you" narrative who are the targets of my ire.
-
-
You're now saying that I should have taken the time to address the (unfounded) criticisms of a random man that harassed me online?
-
The criticisms were not “unfounded,” in my view, and criticism of a paper is not “harassment.”

- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
Here's a good example of the bad faith at play here. The author brushes off an **appropriate** use of the word "could" in the original paper & simply proceeds to pretend they wrote "does" so he can have an excuse for smug posturing. People are allowed to write theories and ideas.pic.twitter.com/hQgFksSbMK
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
