When Bill Gates helped fund that study I linked to (as the article you just linked to confirms)....I think you can give the public a break for questioning if the “dissolvable microneedles” placed under the skin in the study might be used in a Coronavirus vaccine
-
-
Replying to @microbeminded2 @aetiology and
If you have information to the contrary of course share it widely. Just stop calling people who are concerned about the topic conspiracy theorists and definitely stop mocking people in the process
3 replies 2 retweets 11 likes -
I give the general public plenty of breaks. I understand most won't ever see the original research. It's the leaders like RFK Jr and others who push the "they're going to forcibly microchip you" narrative who are the targets of my ire.
1 reply 2 retweets 29 likes -
First, I’ve seen your twitter and you never give the public a break. Ever. Beyond that though what “original research “are you even talking about?
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
The paper you cite. How many do you think have read it of those who are pushing the "Gates is microchipping people" narrative? I will never give RFK Jr and other grifters a break. But I feel for those who are taken in by their narratives. That included my dad. He died b/c of it.
4 replies 1 retweet 45 likes -
Tara - many have read it. So if you want to position yourself as an expert on vaccine issues then you need to be much more nuanced w/ your comments. You need to be more clear w/ your sources, and you need to sometimes acknowledge when the concern of the public cld be legitimate..
4 replies 0 retweets 5 likes -
YOu don't know Tara very well, do you? She is nuanced, more so than most of us battling antivaccine disinformation.
1 reply 0 retweets 22 likes -
Gorski spare me your eyeroll. Remember when your science-based cult trashed this 2009 paper published by my research team?…basically over the idea that pathogens in the human microbiome could contribute to chronic inflammatory disease?


:https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/the-microbial-metagenome/ …3 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @gorskon and
The same paper that led the Faculty of 1000 + Steven Witkin (Weill Cornell Medical College) to state “The observations presented in this review are thought-provoking and offer new ways of thinking about the origin of diseases and possible novel treatments.”pic.twitter.com/iKTJcpNn6v
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @gorskon and
I was 26 years old at the time, and it was one of my first-author papers. You tried to destroy my career by writing that blog post. It was so pathetic. I feel very sorry for the naive MD and PhD students who look up to you.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Oh please. I didn’t write that post. @MarkCrislip did. That being said, Mark is an infectious disease doctor and knows what he’s talking about, which is why I’m sorry he retired from writing for @ScienceBasedMed.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @aetiology and
Please? So you think that Crislip who wrote for YOUR site (a man in a position of authority) defaming a 26-year old female PhD student on the internet, without even ever speaking to her personally abt his “concerns” was OK?
4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @microbeminded2 @aetiology and
I note that you haven’t addressed his specific criticisms.
3 replies 0 retweets 21 likes - Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.