Pretty much, yes. Anecdotal reports and in vitro studies only to date.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I get how desperate people are to find something that works but chloroquine has a history of being a promising antiviral in vitro that can never deliver on its promises in vivo. I don’t know why we keep obsessing over it.
-
IKR? I know it had in vitro activity, but the clinical evidence always disappoints. The cult around it is approaching high dose vitamin C level.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
IIRC, Raoult began by claiming that his "HCQ-cures-Covid" intuition would be supported by data from studies in China. Then the positive results failed to arrive so he had to scrape together his own study-shaped artefact.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
YET APPARENTLY THE FDA ARE NOW PUSHING THIS. PEOPLE AT FDA SHOULD BE CHARGED IF IT TURNS OUT THEY ARE APPEASING TRUMP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I mean, this counts as a clear fraud, doesn't it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
-
the 2 french studies were seriously flawed. they provide no information on the topic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Serious question, because I am not a doctor. But, it seems to me that of all the potential treatments we're looking at right now, none are proven, chloroquine doesn't seem super promising, and using antibodies from the plasma of recovered patients seems much more so. True?
-
That seems to be the case at this time, but chloroquine definitely wins the prize for hype-to-promise ratio.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.