A nice dissection of Raoult’s first paper. Now they should do the new one. The problem is, I fear that Raoult can publish crap studies faster than we can shoot them down. https://annals.org/aim/fullarticle/2764065/rush-judgment-rapid-reporting-dissemination-results-its-consequences-regarding-use …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm utterly disgusted that the FDA has approved this because Trump promoted it. Docs will use their own judgement and I realize options are few for treatment but I wouldn't want this drug not knowing the long term effects and given the risks.
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
He’s got his ethics backwards.
- Show replies
-
-
-
What about the Zelensky study? Larger and more recent. Quite impressive.
-
Link it?
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Is it wrong that I really hope hydroxychloroquine works to reduce viral load? I wish we had something to give health care workers prophylactically until they develop a vaccine.
-
By the way, this study is recruiting across the US. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04308668?type=Intr&cond=Covid&map_cntry=US&map_state=US%3ANY&draw=2&rank=7 … They’re recruiting HCWs with recent COVID19 exposure for prophylaxis or treatment if symptomatic. Non-HCWS also eligible if symptomatic or household contact of confirmed case.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.