Alright. Tell you what. Tell me which of my specific criticisms of the study were wrong and why. You can’t. It was a crappy study that actually showed nothing, much less that hydroxychloroquine cures #COVID19, as the authors hyped.https://twitter.com/DavidNJ/status/1242269435668430853 …
-
Show this thread
-
Here’s a link to my post, for those of you who haven’t read it.https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/are-hydroxychloroquine-and-azithromycin-an-effective-treatment-for-covid-19/ …
1 reply 6 retweets 27 likesShow this thread -
Let’s just put it this way. The plural of “anecdote” is not “data.”
3 replies 14 retweets 76 likesShow this thread -
Oh, and Didier Raoult, the French scientist begins the trial, wrote a book with antivaccine propaganda. https://www.amazon.fr/vérité-sur-vaccins-Didier-Raoult-ebook/dp/B07891P8DD/ref=sr_1_3?__mk_fr_FR= …ÅMÅŽÕÑ&dchild=1&keywords=Didier+Raoult&qid=1585016451&sr=8-3
5 replies 2 retweets 23 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @gorskon
I haven't read the book but I'm not aware of real antivaccine opinions held by Raoult, to be honest. He's got heterodox (and often misinformed and/or stupid) opinions about almost anything, including vaccines, but he actually advocates for much more vaccination than
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
He questions the effectiveness of MMR. No, seriously, he does.

Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.