This could be the single dumbest Tweet (other than one of Trump’s Tweets) about #covid19 that I’ve seen. Does this guy even have clue one about what 2% mortality looks like? If only 5% of the US population were infected (~16.5M), 2% case fatality could mean 330K dead. 1/
https://twitter.com/RichardEngel/status/1232770729290035202 …
-
Show this thread
-
That doesn’t even count the 14% severe cases (marked by difficulty breathing), and 5% critical (respiratory failure, septic shock, and/or multiple organ dysfunction or failure), which would utterly overwhelm our hospitals. 2/ http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/02/study-72000-covid-19-patients-finds-23-death-rate …
2 replies 8 retweets 55 likesShow this thread -
Assuming the case fatality rate actually does turn out to be 2%, no, 98% won’t necessarily be fine. 5% could end up on ventilators for varying lengths of time, for instance. There will be sequelae. 3/
1 reply 8 retweets 53 likesShow this thread -
Yes, I know trust the deaths won’t be randomly distributed. It’ll be the elderly and those with chronic illness who’ll have a higher mortality rate than the young and healthy. But it’ll still be a lot of deaths. Don’t the old and medically frail count? 4/
1 reply 9 retweets 60 likesShow this thread -
Think of it this way. The case fatality rate for the influenza pandemic of 1918 was estimated to be “only” around 2-3% by
@WHO. How’d that turn out? After all, 97-98% of those who got the Spanish flu were “fine.”
5/4 replies 14 retweets 68 likesShow this thread -
just to make it clear for the folks in the back: the influenza pandemic of 1918 killed twice as many people as World War I did.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes
Yup. It causes worldwide disruption, tens of millions of deaths worldwide, etc.
-
-
Caused.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.