I’d long suspected this, more so after CFI merged with @rdfrs, but to see @center4inquiry’s obliviousness on issues of race & racist pseudoscience so starkly described by @ksenapathy is depressing to me as a longtime CFI supporter.https://undark.org/2020/02/20/center-for-inquiry-race-pseudoscience/ …
-
-
Here’s hoping that
@center4inquiry,@rdfrs, and@RBlumner, instead of reacting defensively, take@ksenapathy’s article as an opportunity to reflect and open a genuine dialogue.Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
After many credible allegations of sexual harassment and assault. And dismissing them as mere allegations We would have to believe that skeptics are falsely accused of sexual assault at far higher rate than the general population.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It's hard to get your support or the support of others when many of us call out snake oil. We aren't important enough for a response. A standard hashtag might help build a community.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Re: Insensitivity to matters of racism and misogyny. Are you referring to racism/misogyny WITHIN the skeptical community (e.g. ignoring claims of sexual harassment at a skeptics meeting) or ways in which people hold false beliefs about race and/or sex?
-
Both, but mainly the former. Did you read the article?
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.