-
-
I think you're reading in too much here. I've asked questions of you to try and get clarifications. That is all. What about my tweet is defense of what he said? And again, I'm a moron when it comes to hard science. I know enough to easily be wrong.
-
Aside from Dawkins deciding to ignore history, he's objectively wrong about eugenics being possible for "desirable" human traits. We don't breed for simple traits like meat or colouration. We are an incredibly complex mix of multifactorial genetics and environmental influence.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
