Ha! Even @sciencemagazine knows that @ACSHorg is basically a shill for industry. 1/https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/02/12/editors-journal-science-call-me-corporate-shill-14566 …
-
Show this thread
-
In this one area, at least,
@sciencemagazine gets it. 2/https://www.acsh.org/news/2020/02/12/editor-journal-science-doubles-down-double-standard-14569 …1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
This post by
@ACSHorg from January 2017 effusively praising all of President Trump's picks for top posts at@EPA,@HHSGov,@ENERGY, and@USDA ought to tell you all you need to know about the organization's pro-industry slant. 3/https://www.acsh.org/news/2017/01/30/evaluating-president-trumps-science-and-health-choices-10784 …1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Yes,
@ACSHorg is pro-vaccine/anti-quackery, but that's mainly because big pharma shares those views. When it comes to any suggestion that the food industry and big agriculture might have had a role in fueling the obesity epidemic, ACSH vigorously defends these industries. 4/1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread -
Sometimes pro-industry bias of
@ACSHorg pops up in the mainstream media, such as when@iamsambee did a segment for@TheDailyShow 11 years ago making fun of ACSH's objection to@MichelleObama's organic garden at the White House. 5/http://www.cc.com/video-clips/3idf3c/the-daily-show-with-jon-stewart-little-crop-of-horrors …1 reply 0 retweets 5 likesShow this thread
Senior editor Tim Appenzeller at @sciencemagazine has @AlexBerezow and @ACSHorg's number. ACSH is totally astroturf, as @MarkHoofnagle explains. 6/6 https://denialism.com/2017/03/09/acsh-is-astroturf-heres-why/ …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.