I have read this perverse editorial @doritmi ...
Your argument is blatantly one sided..
Your Opinion.. Is mute...http://blogs.harvard.edu/billofhealth/2013/06/24/guest-post-no-liability-for-failure-to-vaccinate-the-case-has-not-been-made-a-response-to-mary-holland/ …
-
Show this thread
-
Replying to @med1cinewoman @unhealthytruth and
Note that selling homeopathy for tumor treatment goes far beyond not safe. It’s dangerous.
13 replies 14 retweets 100 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @unhealthytruth and
Go back and read again. The language is clear as to how I help and assist my clients. I make no claims that are suggestive of danger. As a lawyer you should have noticed.
5 replies 3 retweets 10 likes -
Replying to @med1cinewoman @unhealthytruth and
You're a homeopath who claims to focus on consulting patients with things like cancer, which need actual, real treatment. That's problematic and dangerous. (of course, misleading people into blaming autism on
#vaccines is another issue).pic.twitter.com/MtWTI6ImO3
2 replies 13 retweets 55 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @unhealthytruth and
The key word here is "consulting".
15 replies 2 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @med1cinewoman @unhealthytruth and
Aside from “follow evidence based science,” for which they don’t really need you, what consulting can you do that doesn’t raise serious concerns for their safety?
1 reply 0 retweets 42 likes -
Replying to @doritmi @med1cinewoman and
A homeopath targeting cancer patients is a concern.
7 replies 4 retweets 50 likes
Holy hell! I didn't realize she was a homeopath treating cancer patients. As a cancer doc, I find that far worse than problematic.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.