Seriously, dude. This is embarrassing. This paper hasn’t been peer reviewed, and commenters are quite correctly trashing it in the comments. 1/
https://twitter.com/DrEricDing/status/1223305946723704832 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
For example: “It is likely that the evolutionary relationships found between these two protein sequences of both viruses are due to a complete coincidence and, stepping back, do not appear “uncanny” to multiple experts that have also examined the sequences.” 2/
1 reply 1 retweet 15 likesShow this thread -
“...the authors base their analysis on a short sequence of the spike protein from 2019-nCoV, but a much more comprehensive search outside fo the viral sequences queried in the manuscript demonstrates that this sequence is also found in *many* *many* other places than HIV.” 3/
1 reply 1 retweet 17 likesShow this thread -
Really lame,
@DrEricDing. You clearly have no idea what you’re talking about. 4/43 replies 2 retweets 17 likesShow this thread -
This Tweet is unavailable.
No, present evidence does not support the claim that it's artificial.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.