If researcher A claims X is true, and researcher B claims X is false, who is the defender of science then? When someone pretends to be the „defender of science“ on a contested, equivocal issue, he/she is presumptuous in my opinion. Science is messyhttps://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/standing-expertise-fools-errand …
Sure, and I'm free to point out that you're misrepresenting what the article is about.
-
-
Okay, if you think so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.