ISchedules are based studies (& profit motives, no doubt...64B industry...outspends oil/gas 2:1 if memory serves) so if the CDC is manipulating data (ample evidence) to set schedules then to me that’s mexically criminal. 4B in vax injury payouts.
-
-
Replying to @AlysonStonebra1 @ShooguhLipz and
the schedule is based on physiology of the immune system and when kids will respond to each of the vaccines. Pathogens don't wait for kids to get older to infect them. the majority of payouts are negotiated settlements. VICP has a bar that is much lower than required for science.
3 replies 2 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @mcfunny @ShooguhLipz and
There is not a one size fits when it comes to ANYTHING in medicine. Biological Individuality must be accounted for...& typically is - except for this area of “medicine.”
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlysonStonebra1 @mcfunny and
The vaccines are imitating the pathogens. Since the pathogens don't change depending upon whom they infect, why should the vaccines?
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
Replying to @Awithonelison @mcfunny and
So by this logic, Merck, mfr of dangerous/failed product Vioxx, shouldn't invest in more R&D/ modify it's faulty product; rather it's the faulty genetic makeup of its consumers responsible for 2-3x increased risk of heart attack & stroke.
5 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlysonStonebra1 @Awithonelison and
I'm not anti vaccine; I'm pro safe medicine. All medicines should be held to safety standards & rigorous testing & should take into account the varied health profiles of consumers.
8 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @TimeoutTweeter @Awithonelison and
Based on the toxic ingredient for each, currently I wouldn’t personally ingest any, but believe others have the right to (altho sadly children who can’t make such a decision often suffer as a result). Doesn’t make me anti vaccine. It makes me pro choice w/ regard to vaccines.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlysonStonebra1 @TimeoutTweeter and
You literally believe that all vaccines are toxic and don’t recommend any of them. That makes you antivaccine.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @gorskon @TimeoutTweeter and
I am against the inclusion of all toxic adjuvants. I am pro safe medicine. Big difference. Your choice to interpret as you do.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
These vaccines do not have adjuvants: ActHIB, chickenpox, live zoster (Zostavax), measles, mumps & rubella (MMR), meningococcal (Menactra, Menveo), rotavirus, seasonal influenza (except Fluad), single antigen polio (IPOL), yellow fever. May I presume that you recommend them?
-
-
Replying to @gorskon @TimeoutTweeter and
No indeed, as adjuvants are not the only problematic ingredients in vaccines. When it is sufficiently proven that vaccines are safe & effective, then I'll gladly change my stance...and proclaim it!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AlysonStonebra1 @gorskon and
No, you won't. Because the evidence already exists.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.