For instance, she could run a clinic or be in nursing administration without a license, as long as she doesn’t do direct patient care. That’s still nursing.
-
-
Replying to @gorskon
You could have mentioned that prior to your attempt at embarrassing me into submission. I'm not unreasonable. I see you have a point there, but my back is already against a wall.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @gorskon
You gave only your opinion in the first criticism. I was unaware that I was obligated to accept that as gospel.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @altdrpan
I shouldn’t have used the word “lie,” and for that I’m sorry. (That particular trope REALLY infuriates me.)
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
However you were nonetheless very much incorrect, but in retrospect obviously unaware of the history of that very technique being used to attack pro-science advocates.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
I think many of us don’t know that history.
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
I’ve seen it used on Dr Amy Tuteur.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes -
I’m not surprised. Any time a pro-science advocate lets his/her professional license lapse, for whatever reason, cranks use that to claim they’re “not a doctor.”
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
They like to emphasize that I never passed the bar exam (which I never took, and which is not necessary for a legal academic).
3 replies 0 retweets 7 likes
I know physicians who went into administration and let their board certifications and medical licenses lapse. They’re still physicians.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.